Lesson Plan Reflection Rubric
Please note: This rubric is set up mathematically so that if you hand in the complete assignment on time and get a 1 (Meets Standard) on all other items, you will end up with a 1.6 out of 2. This translates into a score of 160/200 or a low B. A low A or above is achieved with an average score on each item of 1.5 or above.
| 0 Does Not Meet Standard | 1 Meets Standard | 2 Goal | Your Score | |
| A. Timeliness and Completeness
of Submission (60%) |
The instructor reserves the right
to remove points for late or incomplete work. Each .1 point deducted in
this criterion is the equivalent of a 3% reduction in grade. |
|
Work is turned in complete and
on time. |
|
| During the teaching experience
you display enthusiasm and engagement (5%) |
You seem to be “going-through-the-motions.”
Your presentation is boring and un-engaging. |
Teaching is engaging and enthusiastic.
There is evidence of appropriate teacher behavior. |
Teaching is engaging and enthusiastic.
Students, master teacher and instructor can visualize you as a great teacher
based on your presentation. |
|
| Detailed notes and instances from
your tape are recorded on your table (the table where you included specific
instances and times (10%) |
Few incidents are recorded on
your table. Times are not included. |
Some notes are included in your
table, but there is little detail and much of the activity is omitted. |
Detailed notes from your observation
of your video are included along with times from the tape. The instructor
can look at your notes and have a good idea of what happened during the
lesson. |
|
| Written reflection includes all
components and shows thoughtfulness and deep reflection on the experience.
In this section be sure to discuss whether you felt that the students actually
learned and met your stated objectives. (10%) |
No self-reflection on teaching
this lesson is present. |
The document contains a moderately
thoughtful self-reflection. This reflection notes the strengths and weaknesses
of the lesson and gives some specifics about what happened when the lesson
was taught. |
The document includes a thoughtful
and thorough self-reflection on this lesson and the experience of teaching
it. A variety of insights are offered, and these are backed up with specific
examples. |
|
| Specific videotape evidence incorporated
to guide your reflection (5%) |
Little to no evidence from video
included in reflection |
Adequate evidence provided from
video to support your reflections on the lesson. |
Thoughtful reflection and ideas
for change based on evidence from videotape. Many specific examples from
your lesson support your ideas. |
|
| Feedback from master teacher and/or
instructor is incorporated in a final lesson plan to be included in portfolio(5%) |
Lesson plan is not submitted
in an electronic format. There is little to no modification based on instructor
and group member feedback. |
Lesson plan is modified and improved
based on feedback from instructor and other group members. |
Outstanding reflection and modification
of lesson based on feedback. Incorporated in the plan are strategies to
help meet the needs of diverse kinds of learners. |
|
| Grammar, spelling, standard formatting
techniques (12 point font, 1 inch margins etc.) and writing style for written
reflection (5%) |
The document contains numerous
spelling, grammar and format errors and/or it is otherwise unprofessional.
|
Minor spelling, grammar or format
errors appear in the document, but it is reasonably professional. |
The document is error-free, in
the correct format, and exceptionally professional. |